CVEs.

Vulnerabilities published in the last two years in software made by the companies on the wall: clients, SDKs, agents and self-hosted editions. A CVE here does not mean the hosted service was affected or breached.

NVD data refreshed 9 min ago

Severity of matching CVEs

CVSS base severity, as scored in NVD

Critical
00%
High
2,481100%
Medium
00%
Low or not scored
00%
Matching CVEs
2,481
Last two years
Critical
0
CVSS 9.0 and above
High
2,481
CVSS 7.0 to 8.9
Known exploited
17
On CISA's KEV list

Matching CVEs published

By month, last two years

Peak 399 · October 2026

  • Total: 2445
  • December 2024: 46
  • January 2025: 43
  • February 2025: 35
  • March 2025: 42
  • April 2025: 68
  • May 2025: 45
  • June 2025: 67
  • July 2025: 55
  • August 2025: 83
  • September 2025: 69
  • October 2025: 65
  • November 2025: 55
  • December 2025: 94
  • January 2026: 63
  • February 2026: 72
  • March 2026: 92
  • April 2026: 68
  • May 2026: 134
  • June 2026: 98
  • July 2026: 186
  • August 2026: 222
  • September 2026: 306
  • October 2026: 399
  • November 2026: 38

Most CVEs

In each company's software, last two years

  1. Microsoft 365990
  2. NVIDIA590
  3. GitLab436
  4. Apple (iCloud, App Store and services)348
  5. MongoDB Atlas320
  6. Mattermost Cloud310

Matching CVEs

  1. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-29805 (opens in a new tab)

    Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Outlook for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  2. 8.8High

    CVE-2025-29794 (opens in a new tab)

    Improper authorization in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  3. 7.2High

    CVE-2025-29793 (opens in a new tab)

    Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  4. 7.3High

    CVE-2025-29792 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  5. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-29791 (opens in a new tab)

    Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  6. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27752 (opens in a new tab)

    Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  7. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27751 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  8. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27750 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  9. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27749 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  10. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27748 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  11. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27747 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  12. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27746 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  13. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27745 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  14. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27744 (opens in a new tab)

    Improper access control in Microsoft Office allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  15. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-27489 (opens in a new tab)

    Improper input validation in Azure Local allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    Microsoft Azure· Apr 8, 2025

  16. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-26687 (opens in a new tab)

    Use after free in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  17. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-26642 (opens in a new tab)

    Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

    Microsoft 365· Apr 8, 2025

  18. 7.5High

    CVE-2024-52981 (opens in a new tab)

    An issue was discovered in Elasticsearch, where a large recursion using the Well-KnownText formatted string with nested GeometryCollection objects could cause a stackoverflow.

    Elastic Cloud· Apr 8, 2025

  19. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-32031 (opens in a new tab)

    Apollo Gateway provides utilities for combining multiple GraphQL microservices into a single GraphQL endpoint. Prior to 2.10.1, a vulnerability in Apollo Gateway allowed queries with deeply nested and reused named fragments to be prohibitively expensive to query plan, specifically due to internal optimizations being frequently bypassed. The query planner includes an optimization that significantly speeds up planning for applicable GraphQL selections. However, queries with deeply nested and reused named fragments can generate many selections where this optimization does not apply, leading to si

    Apollo GraphOS· Apr 7, 2025

  20. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-32030 (opens in a new tab)

    Apollo Gateway provides utilities for combining multiple GraphQL microservices into a single GraphQL endpoint. Prior to 2.10.1, a vulnerability in Apollo Gateway allowed queries with deeply nested and reused named fragments to be prohibitively expensive to query plan, specifically during named fragment expansion. Named fragments were being expanded once per fragment spread during query planning, leading to exponential resource usage when deeply nested and reused fragments were involved. This could lead to excessive resource consumption and denial of service. This has been remediated in @apollo

    Apollo GraphOS· Apr 7, 2025

  21. 7.2High

    CVE-2025-31285 (opens in a new tab)

    A broken access control vulnerability previously discovered in the Trend Vision One Role Name component could have allowed an administrator to create users who could then change the role of the account and ultimately escalate privileges. Please note: ths issue has already been addressed on the backend service and is no longer considered an active vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Apr 2, 2025

  22. 7.2High

    CVE-2025-31284 (opens in a new tab)

    A broken access control vulnerability previously discovered in the Trend Vision One Status component could have allowed an administrator to create users who could then change the role of the account and ultimately escalate privileges. Please note: ths issue has already been addressed on the backend service and is no longer considered an active vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Apr 2, 2025

  23. 7.2High

    CVE-2025-31283 (opens in a new tab)

    A broken access control vulnerability previously discovered in the Trend Vision One User Roles component could have allowed an administrator to create users who could then change the role of the account and ultimately escalate privileges. Please note: ths issue has already been addressed on the backend service and is no longer considered an active vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Apr 2, 2025

  24. 7.2High

    CVE-2025-31282 (opens in a new tab)

    A broken access control vulnerability previously discovered in the Trend Vision One User Account component could have allowed an administrator to create users who could then change the role of the account and ultimately escalate privileges. Please note: ths issue has already been addressed on the backend service and is no longer considered an active vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Apr 2, 2025

  25. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1660 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Apr 1, 2025

  26. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1659 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Apr 1, 2025

  27. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1658 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Apr 1, 2025

  28. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-3083 (opens in a new tab)

    Specifically crafted MongoDB wire protocol messages can cause mongos to crash during command validation. This can occur without using an authenticated connection. This issue affects MongoDB v5.0 versions prior to 5.0.31, MongoDB v6.0 versions prior to 6.0.20 and MongoDB v7.0 versions prior to 7.0.16

    MongoDB Atlas· Apr 1, 2025

  29. 8.8High

    CVE-2025-21384 (opens in a new tab)

    An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network.

    Microsoft Azure· Apr 1, 2025

  30. 8.8High

    CVE-2025-2242 (opens in a new tab)

    An improper access control vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.4 prior to 17.8.6, 17.9 prior to 17.9.3, and 17.10 prior to 17.10.1 allows a user who was an instance admin before but has since been downgraded to a regular user to continue to maintain elevated privileges to groups and projects.

    GitLab· Mar 27, 2025

  31. 8.0High

    CVE-2024-9773 (opens in a new tab)

    An issue was discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 14.9 before 17.8.6, all versions starting from 17.9 before 17.8.3, all versions starting from 17.10 before 17.10.1. An input validation issue in the Harbor registry integration could have allowed a maintainer to add malicious code to the CLI commands shown in the UI.

    GitLab· Mar 27, 2025

  32. 7.8High

    CVE-2024-58105 (opens in a new tab)

    A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One Security Agent Plug-in User Interface Manager could allow a local attacker to bypass existing security and execute arbitrary code on affected installations. This CVE address an addtional bypass not covered in CVE-2024-58104. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Mar 25, 2025

  33. 7.8High

    CVE-2024-58104 (opens in a new tab)

    A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One Security Agent Plug-in User Interface Manager could allow a local attacker to bypass existing security and execute arbitrary code on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

    Trend Micro· Mar 25, 2025

  34. 8.8High

    CVE-2025-25274 (opens in a new tab)

    Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.2, 10.3.x <= 10.3.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.8 fail to restrict command execution in archived channels, which allows authenticated users to run commands in archived channels.

    Mattermost Cloud· Mar 21, 2025

  35. 8.8High

    CVE-2025-25068 (opens in a new tab)

    Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.2, 10.3.x <= 10.3.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.8, 10.5.x <= 10.5.0 fail to enforce MFA on plugin endpoints, which allows authenticated attackers to bypass MFA protections via API requests to plugin-specific routes.

    Mattermost Cloud· Mar 21, 2025

  36. 7.5High

    CVE-2024-12720 (opens in a new tab)

    A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability was identified in the huggingface/transformers library, specifically in the file tokenization_nougat_fast.py. The vulnerability occurs in the post_process_single() function, where a regular expression processes specially crafted input. The issue stems from the regex exhibiting exponential time complexity under certain conditions, leading to excessive backtracking. This can result in significantly high CPU usage and potential application downtime, effectively creating a Denial of Service (DoS) scenario. The affected version is v4.46.3

    Hugging Face· Mar 20, 2025

  37. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-0755 (opens in a new tab)

    The various bson_append functions in the MongoDB C driver library may be susceptible to buffer overflow when performing operations that could result in a final BSON document which exceeds the maximum allowable size (INT32_MAX), resulting in a segmentation fault and possible application crash. This issue affected libbson versions prior to 1.27.5, MongoDB Server v8.0 versions prior to 8.0.1 and MongoDB Server v7.0 versions prior to 7.0.16

    MongoDB Atlas· Mar 18, 2025

  38. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1652 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  39. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1651 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  40. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1650 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Uninitialized Variable vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  41. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1649 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Uninitialized Variable vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  42. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1433 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  43. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1432 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted 3DM file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Use-After-Free vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  44. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1431 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  45. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1430 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  46. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1429 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  47. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1428 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  48. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-1427 (opens in a new tab)

    A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Uninitialized Variable vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

    Autodesk· Mar 13, 2025

  49. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-1257 (opens in a new tab)

    An issue was discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting with 12.3 before 17.7.7, 17.8 prior to 17.8.5, and 17.9 prior to 17.9.2. A vulnerability in certain GitLab instances could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service condition by manipulating specific API inputs.

    GitLab· Mar 13, 2025

  50. 7.4High

    CVE-2024-8402 (opens in a new tab)

    An issue was discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 17.2 before 17.7.7, all versions starting from 17.8 before 17.8.5, all versions starting from 17.9 before 17.9.2. An input validation issue in the Google Cloud IAM integration feature could have enabled a Maintainer to introduce malicious code.

    GitLab· Mar 13, 2025

Public information only

Everything on this page was already published by the companies themselves or by public bodies. statuswall gathers it in one place, links every item to its original, and adds nothing from private or leaked sources.

Sources

How fresh it is

  • New and changed CVEs: pulled from NVD every two hours; last run 9 min ago
  • Known-exploited flags: updated from CISA in the same run
  • Window: the last two years; older entries drop off automatically

Source: the U.S. National Vulnerability Database, refreshed daily, with the known-exploited flag from CISA's KEV catalog. Descriptions are NVD's. A CVE is listed under a company when NVD names that company's product as affected, or when the company's own CVE authority assigned it; companies whose names are common words are matched only by explicit rules, so some CVEs will be missing. This product uses NVD data but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.

statuswall is independent and is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any company named here. Company and product names are used only to identify whose public information is being referred to. The information is provided as is, for general reference, with no guarantee that it is complete, current or free of error; it is not security, legal or purchasing advice. Where this page and an official source differ, the official source is right.