CVEs.

Vulnerabilities published in the last two years in software made by the companies on the wall: clients, SDKs, agents and self-hosted editions. A CVE here does not mean the hosted service was affected or breached.

NVD data refreshed 2 h ago

Severity of matching CVEs

CVSS base severity, as scored in NVD

Critical
00%
High
15100%
Medium
00%
Low or not scored
00%
Matching CVEs
15
Last two years
Critical
0
CVSS 9.0 and above
High
15
CVSS 7.0 to 8.9
Known exploited
0
On CISA's KEV list

Matching CVEs published

By month, last two years

Peak 3 · July 2026

  • Total: 15
  • December 2024: 0
  • January 2025: 0
  • February 2025: 0
  • March 2025: 0
  • April 2025: 0
  • May 2025: 1
  • June 2025: 2
  • July 2025: 0
  • August 2025: 1
  • September 2025: 0
  • October 2025: 0
  • November 2025: 0
  • December 2025: 1
  • January 2026: 1
  • February 2026: 0
  • March 2026: 2
  • April 2026: 0
  • May 2026: 0
  • June 2026: 0
  • July 2026: 3
  • August 2026: 1
  • September 2026: 0
  • October 2026: 2
  • November 2026: 1

Most CVEs

In each company's software, last two years

  1. Microsoft 365990
  2. NVIDIA590
  3. GitLab436
  4. Apple (iCloud, App Store and services)348
  5. MongoDB Atlas320
  6. Mattermost Cloud310

Matching CVEs

  1. 8.7High

    CVE-2026-12708 (opens in a new tab)

    Summary Cloudflare tokio-quiche was found to contain an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in its HTTP/3 DATAGRAM handling. For every previously unseen flow identifier (quarter stream ID) received in a DATAGRAM frame, tokio-quiche creates and retains new, per-flow state. A remote peer can send DATAGRAMs with many distinct identifiers, causing the per-connection flow map and associated channel state to grow without bound. Impact Exploitation can exhaust process memory and cause a denial of service. The vulnerable code is used in both client and server configurations, so either role

    Cloudflare· Nov 10, 2026

  2. 8.7High

    CVE-2026-105299 (opens in a new tab)

    Summary Before version 0.9.0, the HTTP/1 upstream path in pingora-proxy passed the downstream request through upstream_request_filter and wrote it to the upstream without removing the client's Connection header, other hop-by-hop headers, or the headers Connection nominated, although RFC 9110 Section 7.6.1 requires intermediaries to remove them. The HTTP/2 upstream path already removed Connection and related HTTP/1-specific headers. A client could therefore nominate a header that the application adds in upstream_request_filter (for example, Connection: keep-alive, X-Forwarded-For). A downstream

    Cloudflare· Oct 20, 2026

  3. 7.5High

    CVE-2026-105297 (opens in a new tab)

    Summary Before version 0.8.1, Pingora's HTTP/2 server used the h2 crate's default limits unless the application set its own 16 MiB decoded header-list size and no limit on concurrent streams. A remote, unauthenticated client can send 1-byte HPACK references to a near-empty header, making the server allocate hundreds of thousands of header fields per stream across an unlimited number of streams on one connection, and use HTTP/2 flow control to keep those streams open. This can exhaust memory and degrade or terminate the Pingora process. Impact Remote, unauthenticated denial of service against a

    Cloudflare· Oct 20, 2026

  4. 8.8High

    CVE-2026-11325 (opens in a new tab)

    Description Cloudflare was recently notified by external researchers of vulnerabilities in this archived repository, including a remote code execution issue in `src/index.ts` reachable from certain GitHub Actions workflow configurations. Successful exploitation may expose workflow secrets such as CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN to an attacker. Because this repository has been deprecated since 2024, Cloudflare will not be issuing patches. To remediate this issue, we recommend migrating to `cloudflare/wrangler-action` immediately. Consumers who have already migrated are not affected. Sunse

    Cloudflare· Aug 12, 2026

  5. 7.5High

    CVE-2026-12707 (opens in a new tab)

    Summary Cloudflare quiche was discovered to be vulnerable to memory resource exhaustion due to unbounded queuing of post-handshake client migration events. Impact quiche supports the connection migration features described in Section 9 of RFC 9000, which allows a single QUIC connection to survive changes in the network path. Although quiche implements the protections described in Section 9.3 of RFC 9000 to limit server state commitment, it was discovered that the collection of PathEvents, intended to be consumed by applications via the path_event_next() function, was not bounded. Once the QUIC

    Cloudflare· Jul 14, 2026

  6. 7.5High

    CVE-2026-12523 (opens in a new tab)

    Summary Cloudflare quiche's HTTP/3 layer was discovered to be vulnerable to resource exhaustion (i.e., memory) by means of specially crafted HTTP/3 frames. Impact HTTP/3 defines multiple frame types to support HTTP message exchanges and connection management. Each frame has a length and a payload whose length depends on the frame type. quiche was found to be vulnerable when parsing some frame types to pre-allocating memory based on the declared length. An attacker would not need to send the number of declared bytes to trigger this issue. In addition, quiche was found to not apply QPACK decompr

    Cloudflare· Jul 14, 2026

  7. 7.6High

    CVE-2026-14440 (opens in a new tab)

    Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those paramete

    Cloudflare· Jul 1, 2026

  8. 8.4High

    CVE-2026-2836 (opens in a new tab)

    A cache poisoning vulnerability has been found in the Pingora HTTP proxy framework’s default cache key construction. The issue occurs because the default HTTP cache key implementation generates cache keys using only the URI path, excluding critical factors such as the host header (authority). Operators relying on the default are vulnerable to cache poisoning, and cross-origin responses may be improperly served to users. Impact This vulnerability affects users of Pingora's alpha proxy caching feature who relied on the default CacheKey implementation. An attacker could exploit this for: * Cross-

    Cloudflare· Mar 5, 2026

  9. 7.7High

    CVE-2026-3125 (opens in a new tab)

    A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the @opennextjs/cloudflare package, resulting from a path normalization bypass in the /cdn-cgi/image/ handler.The @opennextjs/cloudflare worker template includes a /cdn-cgi/image/ handler intended for development use only. In production, Cloudflare's edge intercepts /cdn-cgi/image/ requests before they reach the Worker. However, by substituting a backslash for a forward slash (/cdn-cgi\image/ instead of /cdn-cgi/image/), an attacker can bypass edge interception and have the request reach the Worker directly. The JavaScript UR

    Cloudflare· Mar 4, 2026

  10. 7.7High

    CVE-2026-0933 (opens in a new tab)

    SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metac

    Cloudflare· Jan 20, 2026

  11. 7.1High

    CVE-2025-13353 (opens in a new tab)

    In gokey versions <0.2.0, a flaw in the seed decryption logic resulted in passwords incorrectly being derived solely from the initial vector and the AES-GCM authentication tag of the key seed. This issue has been fixed in gokey version 0.2.0. This is a breaking change. The fix has invalidated any passwords/secrets that were derived from the seed file (using the -s option). Even if the input seed file stays the same, version 0.2.0 gokey will generate different secrets. Impact This vulnerability impacts generated keys/secrets using a seed file as an entropy input (using the -s option). Keys/secr

    Cloudflare· Dec 2, 2025

  12. 8.7High

    CVE-2025-7054 (opens in a new tab)

    Cloudflare quiche was discovered to be vulnerable to an infinite loop when sending packets containing RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames. QUIC connections possess a set of connection identifiers (IDs); see Section 5.1 of RFC 9000 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#section-5.1 . Once the QUIC handshake completes, a local endpoint is responsible for issuing and retiring Connection IDs that are used by the remote peer to populate the Destination Connection ID field in packets sent from remote to local. Each Connection ID has a sequence number to ensure synchronization between peers. An unauth

    Cloudflare· Aug 7, 2025

  13. 7.5High

    CVE-2025-4821 (opens in a new tab)

    Impact Cloudflare quiche was discovered to be vulnerable to incorrect congestion window growth, which could cause it to send data at a rate faster than the path might actually support. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability by first completing a handshake and initiating a congestion-controlled data transfer towards itself. Then, it could manipulate the victim's congestion control state by sending ACK frames covering a large range of packet numbers (including packet numbers that had never been sent); see RFC 9000 Section 19.3. The victim could grow the congestion windo

    Cloudflare· Jun 18, 2025

  14. 7.8High

    CVE-2025-6087 (opens in a new tab)

    A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the @opennextjs/cloudflare package. The vulnerability stems from an unimplemented feature in the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next, which allowed unauthenticated users to proxy arbitrary remote content via the /_next/image endpoint. This issue allowed attackers to load remote resources from arbitrary hosts under the victim site’s domain for any site deployed using the Cloudflare adapter for Open Next. For example: https://victim-site.com/_next/image?url=https://attacker.com In this example, attacker-controlled content from att

    Cloudflare· Jun 16, 2025

  15. 7.4High

    CVE-2025-4366 (opens in a new tab)

    A request smuggling vulnerability identified within Pingora’s proxying framework, pingora-proxy, allows malicious HTTP requests to be injected via manipulated request bodies on cache HITs, leading to unauthorized request execution and potential cache poisoning. Fixed in: https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/fda3317ec822678564d641e7cf1c9b77ee3759ff https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/fda3317ec822678564d641e7cf1c9b77ee3759ff Impact: The issue could lead to request smuggling in cases where Pingora’s proxying framework, pingora-proxy, is used for caching allowing an attacker to ma

    Cloudflare· May 22, 2025

Public information only

Everything on this page was already published by the companies themselves or by public bodies. statuswall gathers it in one place, links every item to its original, and adds nothing from private or leaked sources.

Sources

How fresh it is

  • New and changed CVEs: pulled from NVD every two hours; last run 2 h ago
  • Known-exploited flags: updated from CISA in the same run
  • Window: the last two years; older entries drop off automatically

Source: the U.S. National Vulnerability Database, refreshed daily, with the known-exploited flag from CISA's KEV catalog. Descriptions are NVD's. A CVE is listed under a company when NVD names that company's product as affected, or when the company's own CVE authority assigned it; companies whose names are common words are matched only by explicit rules, so some CVEs will be missing. This product uses NVD data but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.

statuswall is independent and is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any company named here. Company and product names are used only to identify whose public information is being referred to. The information is provided as is, for general reference, with no guarantee that it is complete, current or free of error; it is not security, legal or purchasing advice. Where this page and an official source differ, the official source is right.